Originally posted by delaney: I would've expected somewhere closer to 12 to 15%. Certainly that is a big percent, and frankly 8% is pretty significant, but I just keep taking input from people and from what many seem to be saying is that they simply didn't see many deer. I was actually hoping for a double digit decrease because I think that would've brought about a more aggressive attempt at reducing bonus tags and such. I had a conversation with a gentleman in Plymouth on Tuesday and he said the same many say in that one side of Marshall County has almost no deer and the other side has probably too many deer. The future will be feast or famine in my opinion for a lot of areas. This gentleman whose name is Alan Collins has a pretty decent idea as to the deer situation up there in my opinion.
Delaney.....don't you think they have to take ehd into account along with harvest data?
Hunting, Fishing, and Trapping is where it's @!!!!!
