"Indeed its easy to see the conundrum. Either view is rooted in philosophy. There's an attitude often accepted that assumes no matter what, we ought to be rescued (regardless whether its individuals or enterprise). Is there any end to the entitlement mentality? Essentially, we have a latter day doctrine saying that Darwin is wrong and **** well intend to prove it."

I thought I'd post this comment up from another website talking about a totally different issue. This was a post by a gentleman in California but I think it pretty much sums up what we are dealing with. The "we ought to be rescued". "We" have for years wanted more tags, more season, more opportunity, more weapons, more, more, more. (Generally speaking) And now, when one aspect of the "more" starts running low, the very entity that was asked to constantly provide "more" is now being ridiculed and asked to "rescue us" by saving the deer herd. But of course, the issue will always remain who has to, or is willing to, give up some of their "more" to benefit the big picture.
__________________