Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
#4959
01/07/2014 02:57 AM
01/07/2014 02:57 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,449 Seymour
pav
OP
Hoosier Hunter
|
OP
Hoosier Hunter
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,449
Seymour
|
Originally posted by jjas: Indiana hunters have been killing antlered vs antlerless deer in the 60/40 range since 2006.
In the last four years, let's look @ the data.....
Year Total Harvest Antlered % Antlerless % 2009 132,000 53,000 40 79,000 60 2010 134,000 53,000 40 81,000 60 2011 129,000 51,000 39 78,000 61 2012 136,000 46,000 34 90,000 66
So in the first year of the new regs (aimed @ herd reduction) you see exactly what was designed to happen, happen. First, thanks for responding with something other than crossbow banter. That arguement seems to still be going full bore on this thread. Actually, the data you provided only works *IF* you consider buck fawns as female deer. The pre-2012 harvest ratio was pretty consistently in the 50/50 range......female/male. The changes implemented in 2012 cut the gap to almost 55/45....so the ratio did improve. But my point is...at what cost? Are we being too aggressive, too fast? The antlered kill dropped 5,000 animals in spite of more antlered opportunity being introduced. This would seem to indicate a herd in decline, correct? Yet we killed 12,000 more antlerless deer than the year before. How long can this go on? What if the 1.0 reg had been in place in 2012? What would the antlered harvest number been? Minus 6,000?....minus 8,000?....minus 10,000? Hard to say for sure, but removing 14 days from GF and ML season lengths would have surely made a significant dent. The lower the antlered kill....the fewer dead does it takes to improve the ratio. This is the point I'm trying to make. We could have gone with a much less aggressive approach, proposed by the DNR...but deer hunters did not let that happen. Yes, 2.0 was a DNR proposal too...but it wasn't what they wanted...and their hands were tied by the NRC.
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
pav
|
01/04/2014 12:12 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Jeff Valovich
|
01/04/2014 12:23 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
BREW...
|
01/04/2014 01:21 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Bryan78
|
01/04/2014 01:29 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
jjas
|
01/04/2014 02:03 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
delaney
|
01/04/2014 02:44 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
jjas
|
01/04/2014 02:46 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
delaney
|
01/04/2014 02:50 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
John Scifres
|
01/04/2014 03:16 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Jeff Valovich
|
01/04/2014 03:20 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
hornharvester
|
01/04/2014 03:24 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Bryan78
|
01/04/2014 04:18 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Bryan78
|
01/04/2014 04:27 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
randy_weiland
|
01/04/2014 07:06 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
cedarthicket
|
01/04/2014 08:28 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
familytradition
|
01/04/2014 09:48 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Jeff Valovich
|
01/05/2014 01:05 AM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Bryan78
|
01/05/2014 09:31 AM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
76chevy
|
01/05/2014 10:04 AM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Shelby County Hunter
|
01/05/2014 11:13 AM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
John Scifres
|
01/05/2014 11:21 AM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Jeff Valovich
|
01/05/2014 11:47 AM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
delaney
|
01/05/2014 11:59 AM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
jjas
|
01/05/2014 12:27 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
DawnPatrol
|
01/05/2014 12:32 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
buckwheat
|
01/05/2014 12:37 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
DawnPatrol
|
01/05/2014 12:44 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
DawnPatrol
|
01/05/2014 12:45 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
buckwheat
|
01/05/2014 12:46 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
buckwheat
|
01/05/2014 12:48 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
DawnPatrol
|
01/05/2014 12:48 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Bryan78
|
01/05/2014 01:07 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Bryan78
|
01/05/2014 01:11 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Bryan78
|
01/05/2014 02:14 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Yaz
|
01/05/2014 03:04 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Steiny
|
01/05/2014 03:39 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
countryboy
|
01/05/2014 04:08 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
THROBAK
|
01/05/2014 04:39 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
PoseyCoHunter
|
01/05/2014 07:16 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
MKFrench78
|
01/05/2014 07:25 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
MKFrench78
|
01/05/2014 07:35 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
MKFrench78
|
01/05/2014 07:46 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
BREW...
|
01/05/2014 07:50 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
John Scifres
|
01/05/2014 07:51 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
BREW...
|
01/05/2014 07:52 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Bryan78
|
01/05/2014 08:00 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Bryan78
|
01/05/2014 08:03 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
jbwhttail
|
01/05/2014 08:48 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
MKFrench78
|
01/05/2014 08:55 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
MKFrench78
|
01/05/2014 08:58 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
John Scifres
|
01/05/2014 09:40 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
countryboy
|
01/06/2014 12:12 AM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
countryboy
|
01/06/2014 12:25 AM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
PoseyCoHunter
|
01/06/2014 12:32 AM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
trapperDave
|
01/06/2014 07:46 AM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
gundude
|
01/06/2014 08:56 AM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
John Scifres
|
01/06/2014 01:53 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
76chevy
|
01/06/2014 02:14 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
pav
|
01/06/2014 03:42 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
THROBAK
|
01/06/2014 04:40 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Jeff Valovich
|
01/06/2014 05:32 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
jjas
|
01/06/2014 05:35 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
MKFrench78
|
01/06/2014 06:38 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Hanes
|
01/06/2014 06:45 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
John Scifres
|
01/06/2014 06:52 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Bryan78
|
01/06/2014 07:46 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Jeff Valovich
|
01/06/2014 08:15 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
MKFrench78
|
01/06/2014 09:18 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Jeff Valovich
|
01/06/2014 09:40 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
John Scifres
|
01/06/2014 10:54 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Jeff Valovich
|
01/06/2014 11:15 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Hanes
|
01/06/2014 11:20 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
pav
|
01/07/2014 06:57 AM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
pav
|
01/07/2014 07:16 AM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
jjas
|
01/07/2014 08:15 AM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
pav
|
01/07/2014 01:26 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
pav
|
01/07/2014 02:20 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Jeff Valovich
|
01/07/2014 02:31 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
jjas
|
01/07/2014 03:08 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
Scarlett Dew
|
01/07/2014 03:09 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
delaney
|
01/07/2014 03:48 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
DFA
|
01/07/2014 03:51 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
gundude
|
01/07/2014 05:15 PM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
pav
|
01/08/2014 05:59 AM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
pav
|
01/08/2014 06:10 AM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
gundude
|
01/08/2014 08:02 AM
|
Re: 2.0...Too Much, Too fast?
|
jjas
|
01/08/2014 08:37 AM
|
|
|
Forums35
Topics4,663
Posts49,845
Members2,909
|
Most Online188 Sep 19th, 2018
|
|
0 registered members (),
89
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|