Originally posted by js2397: The crazy thing is the people that supported 1.0 said it was the only way to reduce the deer herd.
That is just absolutely false. Not one person I know of said it was the "only" way. There were several ways suggest in committee by many others. The plan you refer to was the DNR's plan 80-90% of it. Were there things that committee members liked about it sure but it was the DNR. Participating in that group and then having the NRC reject it and then having others blame groups like the IDHA was BS. I still get angry that the groups took the hit for the DNR's plan. People want to blame someone for this one blame the NRC as well as the DNR. If the DNR ever ask the groups to support them on something I would run as fast as I can. They need a big license fee increase or they are to start laying people of they say. You are not going to see me stick my neck out.
"It is not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the strong man stumbled, or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena..."
