If they wanted to provide input through the system they would have to buy the sportsmen license or such. The cost of the one time license could be just enough to cover direct cost of producing the license. Or, they could continue to influence in any manner they wish otherwise. Today if the DNR pursues input from them, they contribute nothing to the cost so I don't feel they shouldn't cover some costs related to having their voice heard. Non of their taxpayers dollars goes to Fish and Wildlife, or very, very little.