I don’t think of suppressors as assault weapons... Machine Guns yes.

Mag capacity is not an issue. If I am a teacher (my wife is one) I am currently defenseless against a 10 round mag or a 30 round mag or a 100 round drum. What kind of action is an un-armed person going to take in the 2 seconds it takes to change a mag. You really think that limiting the size of a mag is going to stop or change anything? I would love to hear some examples of times when there was a mass shooting that would have been prevented or limited by having regulations in place for mag capacity.
Explain to me how the “style” of gun makes a difference. I have several semi-auto rifles, shotguns and hand guns. Not sure that my semi-auto .223 Ruger is any less lethal then my AR-15 “style” rifle. Both have taken down many coyotes all of them just as dead as the next. So again I would love to hear how the “style” contributes to the number of casualties in a mass shooting.

We are only taking guns and mags out of the hands of law abiding citizens. Criminals will always be able to get anything they want legal or not. I would much rather defend my self and family with a 30 round mag when the criminal who is breaking into my house has a 30 round mag. These shootings are taking place in so called “gun fee” zones.

I am a hunter, shooter but above all I am an American. The 2nd amendment gives me the right to keep and bare arms. None of the proposed regulations will make any difference in stopping the mass shootings. We are looking at this the wrong way. We need to look at how we treat our mentally disturbed citizens and how we are desensitizing our youth with video games and movies.
IMO