Bottom line here is a guy has a right to defend his property. Reguardless of whether or not you believe that was what he was doing, the dogs were somewhere they weren't supposed to be. I don't think anyone can argue that. What I have the biggest problem with here, is the property owner is facing FELONY charges for "defending his property". I think everyone on this board that owns a gun and a home should have a serious problem with that. And why wasn't the dog owner cited for tresspassing? Just don't all add up to me.