I am happy that you trust the president of the IDHA absolutely with your hunting. Frankly, I do trust him to a point. As I recall, I was against the one buck rule, BUT several years into it I have certainly changed my opinion. I believe he and the IDHA were for it.
However, I do take a peek at the checkbook every once in a while even though I trust my wife and she handles our finances.
So, for me, its not so much a trust issue because I don"t know the people making decisions and recommendations on my behalf.
Surely, there is a way to take the pulse of the hunters in this state AND compile AND analyze AND consider that information.
Make sense?
Or is just allowing allowing a very select few with no real constituency ok?