The comments about more revenue for the DNR, likely not so. Less wounding rates, possibly but possibly not as well. More people coming into the sport, very questionable. Comments of basically "I want it" were good, honest comments without the need for justification. And I did like the comment by the one gentleman who suggested that there could be more accidents but in essence, so be it. And I thought the comments about less recoil for young kids and woman were pretty good. But what you find, as with many other situations where new weapons have been approved, not much said about the aspect of "hunting". Instead, it's most about shooting and in essence, to a degree, using the deer as a target as opposed to hunting the deer and outsmarting the deer to harvest it. What I really wish I could understand is how many days each of the responders hunt each year.