A few points.....


The state wants the herd reduced, period. And this sniping back and forth and finger pointing over what equipment is being (or may be) used isn't going to change that. All it's doing is creating more animosity between hunters.

As far as hprs are concerned, (while I might be wrong), I think the decision is a yes.

Next...IMHO, once archery hunting (due in large part to the inclusion of crossbows) consistently accounts for a larger percentage of the total harvest (and the herd reduction goals have been met and are being maintained) the gun seasons will be shortened and/or moved.

And finally.....

The late antler less season is the DNR's way to be able to add/subtract "gun days" without public input and all the drama that goes along with it and I don't ever see them doing away with that.