Totally understand. That is why there is seldom any group that can satisfy everyone and for those groups that try to take on a multitude of issues at one time, they tend to fail. If I were they, i'd probably ask what is the two or three most significant issues in your view.
But, your point is a good one to further assess. Generally, hunters or sportsmen take the approach that if a group can't satisfy all their individual wishes, then they wouldn't join that group. Fair enough. But, in the meantime, sportsmen suffer drastically because there is no influential group and membership tends to lack and who wins, the legislators, private industry and anyone and everyone except the sportsmen.
I'm not looking for 100% agreement, but I can't commit to an organization if all the information I have to go on is..."IWDHM is committed to advocating for the health of our deer herd and the preservation of our hunting heritage for future generations."
We all want that. It's the how, that seems to be the sticking point.
