Double B great point. There is a big difference. The big issue is hunter access. If anywhere there is hunter access, and you basically have unlimited antlerless harvest, there is going to be some bad apples that are going to overharvest in a given area. If there is not hunter access, it doesn't matter the amount of tags that are allowed, make it 100, if no one can hunt the deer will still overpopulate whether that be true overpopulation above carrying capacity of the habitat, which is very rare in Indiana, or social overpopulation, where the deer are costing someone a buck ($). So we have to guard against those that will without any kind of management plan kill every doe they can in a specific area. If a guy hunts 10 different counties and goes out of state and only kills one in each place, not a problem. However the guy that only has one farm, goes out opening day of gun season and kills four deer, and it happens more than being stated, then he goes home and remains apathetic to what is actually going on with the herd until next year, then that is a problem. If we just have one of those guys, or worse a couple every square mile, then you can see the exponential factor involved. So even if everyone within a couple miles does practice sound management, these bad apples can decimate the herd. I believe someone mentioned earlier there are 10 +/- per square mile. So if just one every other square mile killed every deer they could legally in a 8 bonus county, wouldn't take very many years before there is a severe reduction in the herd for everyone, hunters, wildlife watchers, managers, everyone.