1. The late antlerless season was included in both proposals so like it or not, it was going to happen.
2. Based on 2010's data (which is the last I've seen this broken down this way) only 4.8 % of hunters killed more than 3 deer and only 2.2% of hunters killed more than 4 deer.
3. Do I think there are areas that have been overhunted, had too many deer killed with depredation permits, had a couple of rough winters and bouts of EHD? Sure. Do I think that statewide the herd is in trouble? No, I don't.
Point being...according to the DNR, since 2011 the number of counties with a bonus quota of 8 has dropped from 45 to 23 (as of this coming season) and they lowered the counties eligible to participate in the late antlerless season to 60 (I believe).
So knowing all of this, plus the fact that herd reduction has been going on, it begs the question.....For those who aren't happy, just what would you have had the DNR do for this season?
1 point.....
I would have let the IDNR keep Proposal #1 which was THEIR FIRST CHOICE on how to reduce the herd so we wouldn't have such a mess on our hands now. But that was taken away from them and a choice was forced upon them by the likes of people like jjas.......the perfect recipe for a disastrous mess was born.
Now... People like jjas stand back and say "good job" IDNR, we've got more people complaining about the situation we are all in than ever before. And also at the same time have the audacity to ask "for those that aren't happy, what would you have the IDNR do different".
Typical jjas and Woody mentality.......Screw the IDNR out of their first choice..... And then years later attempt to try to lead the way on how to fix it for us all...... LMAO!!!!!!
