Originally posted by pav:
Originally posted by hornharvester:
[b] To me the DNR wanting the OBR made permanent without a 3 year trial is "throwing the dog a bone" trying to mend fences with the stakeholders.
Do you really believe by reversing one rule change (over a decade old) for a three year period, and keeping all other rule changes instituted over the past ten years, those three year results will be remotely commeasurate to pre-OBR (2001) data? [/b]No different than what the OBR supporters want me to believe. Besides it wasnt a rule change it was a trial period. And again, I dont care what the DNR does with the OBR. h.h.
