So I'm reading a lot of hunters want to vote no. And I see their point. "Section 39, 2-C is very detrimental. That's the only change. They want to put hunting and fishing is the "preferred" way to manage our wildlife. Currently that's legally the only way. What they "prefer" is for those padding their pockets (i.e. insurance companies) to now have the means to kill as many as they want. It has nothing to do with i can't afford a liscense but want to feed my family. Vote NO! We have the right already. It doesn't need amended to open up more friggin loopholes!" That was a guy on Facebook. My opinion right now is. This law is kind of pointless. They will never take away our right to hunt, so putting this ammendment in may interfere with other laws making hunting and fishing way more Complicated then it already is. It may turn hunting and fishing into another government hoop we have to jump through to enjoy.