I do not think the man acted responsibly shooting these dogs. I agree a man has a right to defend himself from immediate harm but the man admits that he was out of harms way before he got his gun and went back outside.

I highly doubt those dogs were attacking him or his dog but who knows, I was not there. What I do know is that the man and his dog were out of a "threatening situation" before he went back out for more. If it was that dangerous, he should have stayed inside and called the authorities.

Very poor judgment. The man should have called the authorities and expressed his anger with the gentlemen rather than the dogs. Contrary to what some suggest, dogs do not know boundaries but people do and the bottom line the man was out of harms way before going back out looking and finding trouble.